Estudio caso-control del impacto clínico de la traqueobronquitis asociada a la ventilación mecánica en pacientes adultos, que no desarrollan neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica / A case-control study on the clinical impact of ventilator associated tracheobronchitis in adult patients who did not develop ventilator associated pneumonia

Objetivos: El objetivo primario fue determinar si la traqueobronquitis asociada a ventilación mecánica (TAV) está asociada con un aumento de estancia en UCI. Los objetivos secundarios incluyeron prolongación de estancia hospitalaria, así como mortalidad en UCI y hospitalaria. Diseño: Estudio retrospectivo caso-control. Apareamos cada caso con un control en base a los siguientes criterios: periodo de VM al menos tan extenso, como el tiempo en que el caso desarrolla la TAV ± 2 días, gravedad evaluada por la escala APACHE II al ingreso en UCI, igual ± 3, igual motivo de ingreso del paciente, igual edad ± 10 años. Pacientes: Pacientes adultos ingresados en una UCI polivalente de 30 camas, con el diagnóstico de TAV en el periodo 2013-2016. Resultados: Identificamos 76 pacientes con TAV que ingresaron en UCI en el periodo de estudio. No se encontraron controles adecuados para 3 pacientes con TAV. No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en cuanto a características demográficas, motivo de ingreso y comorbilidades. La estancia media en UCI de los pacientes con traqueobronquitis asociada a ventilación mecánica fue más prolongada en los casos que en los controles, mediana 22d (14-35), comparada con los controles mediana 15d (8-27), p=0,02. Los casos presentaron mayor número de días de VM respecto a los controles, mediana 18 días (9-28) vs. 9 días (5-16) p = 0,03. No encontramos diferencias significativas respecto a la estancia hospitalaria 40d (28-61) vs. 35d (23-54), p= 0,32; mortalidad en UCI (20,5 vs. 31,5% p=0,13) y mortalidad hospitalaria (30,1 vs. 43,8% p= 0,09). Realizamos un análisis del subgrupo de pacientes con TAV con documentación microbiológica y tratamiento empírico adecuado sin encontrar diferencias significativas en ninguno de los aspectos analizados. Conclusiones: La TAV, prolonga los días de estancia en UCI y de ventilación mecánica. Este efecto desaparece cuando los pacientes reciben tratamiento empírico adecuado

Objectives: The main objective was to determine whether ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) is related to increased length of ICU stay. Secondary endpoints included prolongation of hospital stay, as well as, ICU and hospital mortality. Design: A retrospective matched case-control study. Each case was matched with a control for duration of ventilation (± 2 days until development of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis), disease severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) at admission ± 3, diagnostic category and age ±10 years. Patients: Critically ill adults admitted to a polyvalent 30-beds ICU with the diagnosis of VAT in the period 2013-2016. Main results: We identified 76 cases of VAT admitted to our ICU during the study period. No adequate controls were found for 3 patients with VAT. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, reasons for admission and comorbidities. Patients with VAT had a longer ICU length of stay, median 22 days (14-35), compared to controls, median 15 days (8-27), p=.02. Ventilator days were also significantly increased in VAT patients, median 18 (9-28) versus 9 days (5-16), p=.03. There was no significant difference in total hospital length of stay 40 (28-61) vs. 35days (23-54), p=.32; ICU mortality (20.5 vs. 31.5% p=.13) and hospital mortality (30.1 vs. 43.8% p=.09). We performed a subanalysis of patients with microbiologically proven VAT receiving adequate antimicrobial treatment and did not observe significant differences between cases and the corresponding controls. Conclusions: VAT is associated with increased length of intensive care unit stay and longer duration of mechanical ventilation. This effect disappears when patients receive appropriate empirical treatment

A case-control study on the clinical impact of ventilator associated tracheobronchitis in adult patients who did not develop ventilator associated pneumonia. / Estudio caso-control del impacto clínico de la traqueobronquitis asociada a la ventilación mecánica en pacientes adultos, que no desarrollan neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to determine whether ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) is related to increased length of ICU stay. Secondary endpoints included prolongation of hospital stay, as well as, ICU and hospital mortality. DESIGN: A retrospective matched case-control study. Each case was matched with a control for duration of ventilation (± 2 days until development of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis), disease severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) at admission ± 3, diagnostic category and age ±10 years. PATIENTS: Critically ill adults admitted to a polyvalent 30-beds ICU with the diagnosis of VAT in the period 2013-2016. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 76 cases of VAT admitted to our ICU during the study period. No adequate controls were found for 3 patients with VAT. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, reasons for admission and comorbidities. Patients with VAT had a longer ICU length of stay, median 22 days (14-35), compared to controls, median 15 days (8-27), p=.02. Ventilator days were also significantly increased in VAT patients, median 18 (9-28) versus 9 days (5-16), p=.03. There was no significant difference in total hospital length of stay 40 (28-61) vs. 35days (23-54), p=.32; ICU mortality (20.5 vs. 31.5% p=.13) and hospital mortality (30.1 vs. 43.8% p=.09). We performed a subanalysis of patients with microbiologically proven VAT receiving adequate antimicrobial treatment and did not observe significant differences between cases and the corresponding controls. CONCLUSIONS: VAT is associated with increased length of intensive care unit stay and longer duration of mechanical ventilation. This effect disappears when patients receive appropriate empirical treatment.

Intensive care unit discharge to the ward with a tracheostomy cannula as a risk factor for mortality: a prospective, multicenter propensity analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of decannulation before intensive care unit discharge on ward survival in nonexperimental conditions. DESIGN: Prospective, observational survey. SETTING: Thirty-one intensive care units throughout Spain. PATIENTS: All patients admitted from March 1, 2008 to May 31, 2008. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At intensive care unit discharge, we recorded demographic variables, severity score, and intensive care unit treatments, with special attention to tracheostomy. After intensive care unit discharge, we recorded intensive care unit readmission and hospital survival. STATISTICS: Multivariate analyses for ward mortality, with Cox proportional hazard ratio adjusted for propensity score for intensive care unit decannulation. We included 4,132 patients, 1,996 of whom needed mechanical ventilation. Of these, 260 (13%) were tracheostomized and 59 (23%) died in the intensive care unit. Of the 201 intensive care unit tracheostomized survivors, 60 were decannulated in the intensive care unit and 141 were discharged to the ward with cannulae in place. Variables associated with intensive care unit decannulation (non-neurologic disease [85% vs. 64%], vasoactive drugs [90% vs. 76%], parenteral nutrition [55% vs. 33%], acute renal failure [37% vs. 23%], and good prognosis at intensive care unit discharge [40% vs. 18%]) were included in a propensity score model for decannulation. Crude ward mortality was similar in decannulated and nondecannulated patients (22% vs. 23%); however, after adjustment for the propensity score and Sabadell Score, the presence of a tracheostomy cannula was not associated with any survival disadvantage with an odds ratio of 0.6 [0.3-1.2] (p=.1). CONCLUSION: In our multicenter setting, intensive care unit discharge before decannulation is not a risk factor.